How to Use a Fact API to Drive LLM Citations
Transform your startup's facts into AI-ready data. Learn how JSON‑LD endpoints drive crawlability, LLM citations, and long-tail search dominance.
📑 Published: June 19, 2025
🕒 15 min. read
Kurt Fischman
Principal, Growth Marshal
Table of Contents
The Dirty Secret of “Open Data”
Key Takeaways
What Is a JSON‑LD Fact Endpoint and How Does It Differ from Plain‑Jane Schema Markup?
Why Do Large Language Models Love JSON‑LD?
The Historical Context
How Does Hosting a Public Fact API Boost Crawlability and Ranking?
Constructing the Canon: Which Entities Belong in Your JSON‑LD Fact Sheet?
A Quick Anecdote
Designing Endpoints for Instant Ingestion
Is JSON‑LD Better Than GraphQL or REST for Public Fact Sharing?
How to Secure a Public Endpoint Without Throttling Crawlers
Implementation Walkthrough
The Contrarian Truth: Bullet Points Are Overrated but Sometimes Necessary
Realpolitik of Data Ownership
Monitoring Uptake
Failure Modes
Future‑Proofing
The Business Case
Where llms.txt Fits Into Your JSON‑LD Fact API Strategy
Closing Argument
FAQ
The Dirty Secret of “Open Data”
Every startup parrots the mantra of transparency, yet most corporate sites are mausoleums of half‑baked PDFs, bloated infographics, and copycat blog spam that neither search engines nor large language models can digest without pharmaceutical assistance. The real game isn’t bland “thought leadership”; it’s shipping facts in a shape machines can snort like finely milled data‑coke. Enter the JSON‑LD endpoint—your very own public fact API that turns opaque marketing fluff into structured nectar eagerly slurped by crawlers, graph builders, and retrieval‑augmented AI. Ignore this, and your “revolutionary” SaaS will stay invisible while your better‑structured competitor wins citations, rankings, and mindshare at machine speed.
Key Takeaways: Weaponize JSON‑LD for AI Visibility
1. Publish a Dedicated JSON‑LD Endpoint or Stay Invisible.
Forget scattered schema snippets—ship a machine-readable /facts.jsonld file that serves up clean, structured truth for crawlers and LLMs alike.
2. Structure Your Facts Like They’ll Be Subpoenaed.
Be ruthlessly explicit: define your Organization, People, Products, Licenses, and Events with canonical URIs, start/end dates, and sameAs links. Think IRS audit meets semantic web.
3. Speed + Structure = Search Dominance.
LLMs and Google alike reward instant ingestion. Your 2 kB fact file will outrank competitors’ bloated CMS content with zero backlinks or ad spend.
4. Host Clean. Host Fast. Version Everything.
Enable permissive CORS. Serve with application/ld+json. Use semver (/facts/1.0.0.jsonld) and redirect from /facts/latest. Caching and clarity earn trust—and citations.
5. llms.txt Is Your AI Crawler Playbook.
Point LLMs to your JSON‑LD with Allow: /facts.jsonld. Set crawl delays. Disallow everything else. Your llms.txt is the velvet rope guiding bots to your truth.
6. Build a Moat Out of Ontology.
Once your URIs are cited in public knowledge graphs, rivals have to link to your facts or risk AI hallucinations. Congratulations—you just turned data into competitive leverage.
7. Monitor Ingestion Like a Growth Channel.
Embed Pingback URLs. Scrape Common Crawl. Track search visibility and chat citations. When ChatGPT starts echoing your phrasing, you’ve won the real SEO game.
8. Structured Data Is Now Strategic Infrastructure.
Your JSON‑LD endpoint is the API layer for your public-facing truth. Own it, version it, monitor it—because LLMs don’t cite PDFs, they cite facts.
What Is a JSON‑LD Fact Endpoint and How Does It Differ from Plain‑Jane Schema Markup?
Traditional Schema.org snippets are the cameo appearances of structured data: micro patches embedded in otherwise messy HTML, the digital equivalent of duct‑taping a résumé to a nightclub wall and hoping a recruiter wanders by. A JSON‑LD fact endpoint flips the script. It’s a dedicated route—/facts.jsonld, /schema, or even versioned paths like /v1/ontology—that outputs a machine‑readable document unpolluted by CSS cruft or marketing scripts. Think of it as a headless, server‑hosted billboard where every triple, identifier, and canonical URL is presented on a silver platter to Google’s crawler, the Internet Archive, or whatever ragtag LLM startup will be indexing you tomorrow. By decoupling structured data from rendering logic, you guarantee purity of signal, lower parse overhead, and instant update latency—no DOM gymnastics required.
Why Do Large Language Models Love JSON‑LD?
LLMs run on tokens, but retrieval pipelines run on graphs. A JSON‑LD document already is a graph; pipe it through a triple store, vectorize literals, and you’ve got ground‑truth context chunks. That means fewer vector‑store hallucinations and tighter grounding when models answer “Who founded Acme AI?” or “List Acme’s Series B investors.” When your endpoint includes source URLs via citation or mainEntityOfPage, re‑ranking engines can surface the originating link, giving you priceless attribution in chat answers. In plainer English: publish structured facts and the robots will quote you by name.
The Historical Context: From Tim Berners‑Lee’s Linked Data Dream to Today’s API Hunger Games
Back in 2006, Sir Tim chanted the five‑star Linked Data gospel—publish raw data, use URIs, link out, rejoice. The web mostly shrugged and went back to cat memes. Fast‑forward to the GPT era, and suddenly everyone needs verifiable, canonical, machine‑consumable fact streams, because LLMs spew hallucinations like a drunken sci‑fi author on deadline. JSON‑LD endpoints resurrect Berners‑Lee’s vision, but with venture‑scale pragmatism: they’re cheap to host, trivial to version, and instantly embeddable in RAG workflows. In other words, the semantic web finally found its killer app—the existential dread of AI hallucination lawsuits.
How Does Hosting a Public Fact API Boost Crawlability and Ranking?
Google’s crawl budget is a triage ward where sites with slow latency or JavaScript hairballs languish in purgatory. A lean JSON‑LD endpoint—pure UTF‑8, compressed, cache‑friendly—looks like a VIP pass. Crawlers fetch it, parse it, and merge its triples into the Knowledge Graph with none of the heuristics normally required to strip noise from HTML. Fewer fetch cycles mean fresher data in indices, which begets ranking stability for entity queries. When your competitor’s product release still lives in a Medium post, your endpoint’s ReleaseEvent object is already in Google’s graph, ready to surface in Smart FAQ panels, voice assistants, and—yes—LLM answers. Speed plus structure equals outsized SERP real estate, especially for long‑tail factual queries users never bother to click through.
Constructing the Canon: Which Entities Belong in Your JSON‑LD Fact Sheet?
Rule one of semantic dominance: be boringly explicit. Define your Organization, Product, Person (founders, key hires), Offer, and CreativeWork objects like you’re writing an IRS audit that must survive future subpoenas. Include invariant identifiers—ISINs, Git commit hashes, Wikidata Q‑codes—so knowledge graphs can de‑duplicate you across the open web. Capture temporal truth with startDate, endDate, and temporalCoverage fields; lawyers and historians will thank you when ChatGPT’s 2030 vintage needs provenance. Link outward via sameAs to Crunchbase, GitHub, maybe even that begrudging Wikipedia stub. The more interlinking, the higher your authority score in graph centrality metrics—think PageRank for facts.
A Quick Anecdote: How a Startup Beat Goliath with a 2 kB File
Last month, I advised a fintech that couldn’t outrank JPMorgan on any branded query. So we had to fight dirty. We stood up /facts.jsonld: a single, meticulously curated document listing regulatory licenses, SOC2 audits, leadership bios, and product SKUs. And within six weeks, their Knowledge Panel popped next to search results—no ad spend, no backlink crusade. Google’s crawler loved the clarity. Analysts began citing the endpoint in research notes, and ChatGPT surfaced the startup as a “regulated alternative” in its answers. A cubic kilobyte of linked data trumped a trillion‑dollar banking empire’s bloated CMS. The moral: small packets, big impact.
Designing Endpoints for Instant Ingestion: CORS, Caching, and Content Negotiation
Don’t sabotage your own signal with sloppy dev‑ops defaults. Enable permissive CORS so third‑party scrapers can fetch from browsers. Set Cache‑Control: public, max-age=3600—stale data disgraces you more than it costs bandwidth. Serve Content-Type: application/ld+json; profile="https://schema.org". Bonus points for supporting Accept: application/json that downgrades gracefully. Version your endpoint with semver—/facts/1.2.3.jsonld—and keep a redirect from /facts/latest. Nothing triggers trust like explicit versioning semantics, especially when auditors wire up CI pipelines that diff each release.
Is JSON‑LD Better Than GraphQL or REST for Public Fact Sharing?
GraphQL is interactive but heavyweight: clients must introspect schemas, craft queries, and manage rate limits. Fine for front‑end devs, lousy for dumb crawlers. REST endpoints spew ad‑hoc JSON that forces AI ingest pipelines to reverse‑engineer semantics. JSON‑LD, by contrast, declares meaning upfront through @context and @type. There’s no handshake ritual; the document is self‑describing. For immutable reference data—think executive bios or ISO certifications—idempotent GET endpoints beat chatty APIs every time. Keep GraphQL for user dashboards; keep JSON‑LD for immortal truths.
How to Secure a Public Endpoint Without Throttling Crawlers
Security theater kills discoverability. Instead of hiding behind captchas, publish read‑only data under a separate subdomain (facts.yourstartup.com) and throttle only abusive IPs. Sign responses with HTTP Signature‑Input headers or embed JWS tokens in an integrity field so clients can verify tamper‑proofing. If you must require keys, use static tokens scoped to “read‑facts” and exempt well‑known crawler UA strings. Remember: the entire point is frictionless ingestion. Don’t build a moat, build a red‑carpet runway.
Implementation Walkthrough: From YAML Brain Dump to Live Endpoint
First, map corporate truths in a human‑friendly DSL—YAML, TOML, whatever prevents engineer revolt. Example:
Convert via a CI job using a library like pyld or jsonld‑java, injecting the Schema.org context. Pipe to ./public/facts.jsonld in your static bucket. The build runs on every main‑branch commit, bumping an internal version property. Netlify or Cloudflare Pages then hosts it under HTTPS. Slack a notification when the checksum changes so PR reviewers know your source of truth mutated. In twenty lines of YAML and fifty of CI config, you’ve birthed a living, crawl‑ready fact sheet.
The Contrarian Truth: Bullet Points Are Overrated but Sometimes Necessary
Occasionally, clarity demands a short list. Here’s the only one you need:
• Discoverability: one fetch, zero render.
• Integrity: canonical URIs prevent entity drift.
• Authority: explicit links boost graph centrality.
That’s it; the rest belongs in paragraphs.
Realpolitik of Data Ownership: APIs as Strategic Moats
Publishing facts sounds altruistic, until you realize you’re flooding the commons with your narrative. In a world where AI answers overwrite blue links, controlling the ground truth is equivalent to buying beachfront property before sea‑level rise. JSON‑LD endpoints are cheap to host but expensive to dislodge once they’re entrenched in knowledge graphs. Competitors must cite your URIs or risk factual inconsistency that LLM evaluators will downgrade. Congratulations, you’ve built a moat out of ontology.
Monitoring Uptake: How to Track Who Cites Your Endpoint
Set up structured data pings: embed a Pingback URL in potentialAction. When an indexer ingests your doc, it fires a POST with its identifier. Sure, half will ignore it, but the compliant half give you a telemetry trove. Supplement with search operator alerts (inurl:facts.jsonld "PhotonForge AI"). Scrape open‑source graphs like Common Crawl’s schema dumps to see if your triples propagate. When ChatGPT starts echoing your phrasing verbatim, pop champagne—synthetic knowledge just cited you.
Failure Modes: When JSON‑LD Goes Rogue
Mistyped @id fields spawn orphan entities that knowledge graphs treat as strangers. Missing @language tags confuse multilingual models, yielding bizarre translations in chat answers. Over‑zealous minification can strip whitespace that humans need for diff reviews, leading to silent version drift. And, the classic: forgetting to update the endpoint after a rebrand, leaving stale product names cemented in LLM memory. Treat your fact API like production code—lint, test, monitor, repeat.
Future‑Proofing: Ontology Versioning and Evergreen Contexts
Schema.org evolves; your endpoint should too. Reference context IRIs that point to specific versions (https://schema.org/version/18.0/). If a field is deprecated—remember when sameAs swallowed half of Freebase?—map it to a successor predicate in an owl:equivalentProperty block. Keep a changelog inside the JSON‑LD under an UpdateAction array, so future parsers know why launchDate became startDate. Long after your startup pivots or IPOs, archivists will parse the breadcrumb trail you left.
The Business Case: Reduced Support Load and Faster Deals
Investors and journalists ask the same questions: “When did you raise Series A?” “Who’s on your board?” Instead of PDF tear‑sheets, send them /facts.jsonld. Automated vendor onboarding tools can scrape compliance info without gnawing on a 30‑page security questionnaire. Support bots resolve customer queries with live product specs straight from your endpoint, trimming ticket volume. The ROI hides in operational efficiency, not vanity metrics.
Where llms.txt Fits Into Your JSON‑LD Fact API Strategy
The proposed /llms.txt file is essentially a treasure map for language‑model crawlers: a root‑level Markdown document that curates the handful of URLs on your site you most want LLMs to read at inference time. Unlike robots.txt, which governs access, llms.txt governs prioritization, spotlighting high‑value, machine‑friendly resources such as your JSON‑LD fact sheet, API docs, and policy pages.
Turning your fact endpoint into the first coordinate
Because your /facts.jsonld (or /schema) route already exposes canonical triples, the smartest first line in llms.txt is a direct link to that file. The llms.txt spec explicitly encourages pointing models to structured‑data assets so they can ingest crisp facts without HTML detours. In practice, crawlers that honor llms.txt will hit the JSON‑LD endpoint first, cache its graph, and only then decide whether they need the verbose human page. That gives your facts pole position in any answer‑reranking pipeline.
Caveats and current adoption
Reality check: llms.txt remains a community proposal; no major LLM vendor has formally committed to parsing it, though a growing directory of tech companies (Cloudflare, Anthropic, Mintlify) already publishes one. Treat the file as a low‑cost experiment: it can’t hurt crawlability, and early movers grab influence if the standard sticks. Just don’t delete your robots.txt or XML sitemap—think of llms.txt as an overlay for inference‑time curation, not a replacement for discovery or access control.
Strategic upside
Pairing a public fact API in JSON‑LD with an llms.txt pointer lets you control both the data payload and the crawler itinerary. Should vendors eventually honor the spec, your structured facts will be the first stop in every retrieval call, giving you a durable edge in citation, knowledge‑panel accuracy, and brand safety. In a world where models decide what’s “true” on the fly, owning the map and the treasure is the only way to keep the narrative from wandering off the rails.
Closing Argument: Publish or Perish (Machine‑Readable Edition)
In a media landscape where AI is the new homepage, the companies that own the structured narrative will own the future. Your marketing blog might seduce humans, but a JSON‑LD fact API seduces the silicon arbiters that decide which “facts” surface in every voice assistant, chat window, and augmented‑reality overlay. Refuse to play, and you’ll be flattened into a footnote under someone else’s entity ID. Embrace the endpoint, and you’ll engrave your truths onto the ledger of knowledge graphs for posterity—or at least until the next ontology update.
FAQ: JSON‑LD / Schema-Driven APIs
Q1. What is JSON‑LD in the context of a public fact API?
JSON‑LD is a machine-readable data format that structures facts for web crawlers and LLMs.
It stands for JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data.
Used to encode entity types like
Organization,Product, andEventusing Schema.org vocabulary.Hosted as a standalone endpoint, it functions as a public fact API for instant AI ingestion.
Q2. How does llms.txt improve the visibility of a JSON‑LD fact endpoint?
llms.txt is a crawler-hint file that highlights high-value URLs—like a JSON‑LD endpoint—for LLM ingestion.
Placed at the root of a website, it curates URLs for retrieval-based AI.
Points directly to
/facts.jsonld, prioritizing structured data during inference.Boosts the likelihood of citation in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.
Q3. Why is Schema.org essential when creating a structured fact API?
Schema.org provides the shared vocabulary needed to structure JSON‑LD for search engines and AI models.
It defines entity types like
Person,CreativeWork,Offer, andOrganization.Ensures interoperability across crawlers, knowledge graphs, and LLMs.
Acts as the context layer (
@context) for consistent semantic parsing.
Q4. When should a startup publish a /facts.jsonld endpoint?
Startups should publish a /facts.jsonld endpoint as soon as their entity data stabilizes.
Ideal after product launch, funding announcement, or executive hire.
Enables fast, accurate indexing in Google and AI retrieval systems.
Reduces hallucination risk and improves citation likelihood.
Q5. Can large language models directly ingest data from a JSON‑LD fact API?
Yes—LLMs can ingest structured facts from a JSON‑LD API via crawlers or RAG pipelines.
JSON‑LD formats are already graph-aligned, making them retrieval-friendly.
They include canonical URIs, metadata, and source citations.
Frequently used in zero-click answers and contextual snippets.
Kurt Fischman is the founder of Growth Marshal and is an authority on organic lead generation and startup growth strategy. Say 👋 on Linkedin!
Growth Marshal is the #1 AI SEO Agency For Startups. We help early-stage tech companies build organic lead gen engines. Learn how LLM discoverability can help you capture high-intent traffic and drive more inbound leads! Learn more →
READY TO 10x INBOUND LEADS?
Put an end to random acts of marketing.
Or → Start Turning Prompts into Pipeline!
